Human Error or Sabotage? The Truth Behind the Air India Crash"

 Human Error or Sabotage? The Truth Behind the Air India Crash"

Here’s a detailed \~500‑word blog-style analysis of the **Air India Boeing 787 crash**, focusing on the likely root causes based on the preliminary report and expert commentary:

---

✈️ Background

On **June 12, 2025**, Air India Flight AI 171, a Boeing 787‑8 Dreamliner, departed Ahmedabad en route to London. Tragically, mere seconds after takeoff, both engines lost power. The aircraft crashed into a dormitory at BJ Medical College, killing **260 people**—**241 onboard** (including a lone survivor) and **19 on the ground** ([The Washington Post][1]).

---

### ⚠️ What Went Wrong?

#### **1. Fuel Cutoff Switch Activation**

The **AAIB’s preliminary investigation** revealed that both engine fuel-cutoff switches were moved from “RUN” to “CUTOFF” during climb, starving the engines of fuel ([The Washington Post][1]).

* Cockpit voice recordings captured a pilot asking, *“Why did you cut it off?”*, with the other responding *“I didn’t do it.”* ([The New Indian Express][2]).

* Though both switches ended up in “RUN” positions post-crash, one engine briefly re-ignited—too late to regain altitude ([mint][3]).

---

### 🧩 Possible Causes

#### a) Human Error or Malicious Intent

Pilot error remains plausible: the switches require deliberate physical manipulation. Aviation consultant Capt. Mohan Ranganathan argues this couldn’t have happened accidentally and suggests **“deliberate human intervention”** ([The New Indian Express][2]).

This shocking claim raises concerns about cockpit safety, stress, and pilot well-being. Investigators will examine workload, mental state, and cockpit procedures.

#### b) Mechanical or Design Fault

A **2018 FAA advisory** noted possible issues with the 787 fuel-switch locking mechanism. Though Air India didn’t act on it, there were **no prior defect reports** ([mint][3]).

Could mechanical failure, vibration, or design flaws have triggered both switches in under a second?

#### c) Procedural and Systems Lapses

Experts emphasize that cockpit instruments and procedures are designed to prevent uncommanded switch movements. The confusion recorded suggests potential **procedural ambiguity**, **human factors**, or **a design flaw** allowing this misconfiguration ([Reuters][4]).

---

### 🛠️ Secondary Factors

* **Flap/gear configuration**: Early speculations pointed to mis-set gear or flaps, possibly inhibiting climb ([India Today][5]). Simulator tests showed gear-down/flaps-retracted alone wouldn’t have doomed the flight—reinforcing the fuel cutoff as the critical failure ([India Today][6]).

* **Bird strike, fuel contamination**: Considered but largely ruled out. No bird debris was found; no evidence of contaminated fuel yet ([mint][7]).

---

### 🔬 What’s Next?

The final investigation will:

1. **Reconstruct cockpit audio**, identifying who—if anyone—operated the switches.

2. **Examine switch hardware**, checking for mechanical faults or software-induced movement.

3. **Review training protocols**, focusing on pilot workflows, automation reliance, and fatigue management.

4. **Assess regulatory oversight**, including why the 2018 advisory was ignored.

---

### 🚨 Broader Implications

* This is the **first fatal Boeing 787 crash**, prompting global safety and design introspection ([The Washington Post][1]).

* Air India, under **Tata Group**, now faces intensified scrutiny over fleet maintenance and pilot training ([Reuters][4]).

* Victim families and pilot unions are demanding transparency, calling for an **independent investigation** ([The Times][8]).

---

 Summary

At this stage, the **simultaneous fuel cutoff** emerges as the undeniable trigger of the crash. Whether it resulted from **deliberate intent**, **pilot error**, or a **mechanical/design failure** remains unresolved. Further forensic, technical, and human-factors analysis will shape the final verdict.

---

**Stay tuned: Investigators expect to release a comprehensive report within a year. Until then, global regulators, airlines, and passengers await answers—and hope action will follow to safeguard future flights.

--